Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:05

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
‘Resident Evil: Requiem’ Will Refocus On the Series’ Past - Gizmodo
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do I want to suck cock tonight?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is it okay for a wife who comes home from a date to tell her husband what she did?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why did the Soviet Jews hate the Soviet Union?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Geologists Accidentally Found a Ghost Plume Rising From Earth’s Mantle - AOL.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Healthy aging: Eating more berries, flavanoids may be key - Medical News Today
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why are the bands Smashmouth and Nickelback often used as punchlines?